Skip to content

Landmark incapacity rights determine Lois Curtis dies : NPR

Lois Curtis was the plaintiff in a civil rights case that gave individuals with disabilities and older individuals the best to reside exterior of establishments and in their very own houses. Curtis died Thursday of most cancers.

John Poole/NPR

cover caption

toggle caption

John Poole/NPR

Lois Curtis was the plaintiff in a civil rights case that gave individuals with disabilities and older individuals the best to reside exterior of establishments and in their very own houses. Curtis died Thursday of most cancers.

John Poole/NPR

Legal professional Sue Jamieson was touring a grim state hospital in Georgia three many years in the past when she was launched to a younger lady, Lois Curtis, who’d spent a lot of her teen years and early 20’s in state establishments.

“As we all the time say, ‘What’s it you suppose we may do for you? I work at Authorized Help. And I am a lawyer,'” Jamieson recalled for an oral historical past for her employer, the Atlanta Authorized Help Society. “And she or he’d say: ‘Get me out of right here. Would you please get me out of right here? When am I getting out of right here?'”

Curtis, who had an mental incapacity and was recognized with psychological sickness, stored calling Jamieson from the hospital, asking when she may get out.

The lawsuit that Jamieson filed on behalf of Curtis and one other lady – LC v. Olmstead – led to a landmark Supreme Court docket determination benefitting aged and disabled individuals, and in the end helped Curtis transfer out of institutional care and into her own residence de ella.

Curtis, 55, died in her own residence exterior of Atlanta on Thursday. The trigger was pancreatic most cancers.

The Supreme Court docket dominated in 1999, in a call delivered by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that Curtis, her co-plaintiff Elaine Wilson and different individuals with disabilities had a proper—beneath the Individuals with Disabilities Act—to reside in a “much less restrictive setting” .”

The landmark civil rights case gave disabled and aged individuals a proper to hunt long-term care providers in their very own house, as an alternative of in an establishment like a nursing house or a psychiatric hospital.

Curtis “created a sea change in what our service methods appear like,” says Alison Barkoff, the highest federal official for growing old and incapacity coverage.

“We went from a system in 1999 that the one locations that most individuals with disabilities and older adults may get providers had been in establishments like nursing houses and psychiatric hospitals, to methods which might be primarily targeted on supporting individuals with providers in their very own houses,” says Barkoff, the appearing administrator and assistant secretary of growing old on the Administration for Neighborhood Residing on the US Division of Well being and Human Providers.

After the Olmstead determination, state Medicaid budgets shifted. At present, extra money goes to pay for care at house. Much less authorities funding goes to pay for care in establishments.

Federal regulation makes nursing house care an entitlement for individuals who meet the eligibility necessities for Medicaid. Residence-based care, though it’s extra in style and have become a proper beneath the Olmstead determination, just isn’t an entitlement.

Consequently, there are lengthy ready lists for care at house—no less than 700,000 individuals ready in some 40 states. However the Olmstead determination requires each state to maneuver towards offering extra of that care at house.

The Olmstead determination is cited in scores of lawsuits to get others out of institutional care. And its use has unfold. The US Division of Justice, within the Obama Administration, utilized the choice’s wording that folks with disabilities are entitled to reside within the “much less restrictive atmosphere” to sue to finish segregated work applications that pay individuals with disabilities a sub-minimum wage. Now mother and father use Olmstead to say their kids must be in built-in school rooms.

The argument behind the Olmstead determination was that when individuals reside totally built-in of their communities, they reside higher, extra fulfilling lives.

Curtis proved it. She moved right into a collection of homes, needing assist from a caregiver with issues like cooking, procuring and different care. And there she found her expertise as an artist—one thing she didn’t get to develop when she lived in state hospitals.

Curtis made pencil and pastel drawings of animals and flowers. And typically she drew individuals whose photos she noticed in magazines and books—like a severe Martin Luther King along with his arms crossed or a shirtless, younger Muhammad Ali.

In 2011, she was invited to the White Home on the anniversary of the Olmstead determination. She offered President Barack Obama a framed image she referred to as “Woman in an Orange Gown.” It was one in every of a collection of self-portraits Curtis did of herself as a younger woman, as a result of she had no images because the years she lived within the state psychiatric hospitals.

Curtis used her art work to satisfy individuals, says Lee Sanders, who was first employed to assist Curtis discover work after which grew to become a good friend. Curtis, Sanders wrote, “created art work as she lived: Her strains de ella drawn with out hesitation, her colours daring and saturated, her photos uncomplicated and spirited.”

Curtis was very social and, along with her fast smile, was gifted at making mates. They purchased her artwork provides from her and helped her promote her artwork work from her.

When Curtis died on Thursday, she was surrounded by lots of these mates.

In a video she made for the Nationwide Incapacity Rights Community in 2020, Curtis stated: “My identify is Lois Curtis… I am glad to be free.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *